In the search for non-partisan political information, a viewer, reader or listener has their work cut out for them. There used to be things called newspapers that would report on both sides of any political issue. They would report facts, which this type of information is composed of. They do not do this, largely, as they have taken sides. What is now reported, even on television, radio and over their outlets on the Internet is what their political party wants them to report.
News junkies used to be able to switch between a few channels on the television or radio and get a good idea about things. There are more media outlets, given the Internet and additional channels because of cable and satellite, however, this has not helped in the matter. In order for truly non partisan information, there must be a desire to respect people enough to give them facts.
Presenting facts, by the talking heads, would not be in their best interests, or so they believe. Political subject matter, in order to be valuable in their minds, must be what the voters want to hear. This makes it extremely important that the information presented be weighted by good sounding comments. This has ushered in bumper sticker politics. None of this is helpful to news junkies as they do not get anywhere near enough informative reporting.
Take the issue of health care, for example. Factual content would simply report the statistics of the number of people who do not have insurance coverage or who have no access to health care. These listeners are told, instead, the emotional recounting of people who have had problems with health care. They fudge the numbers to make it seem as if millions are unable to access health care in an emergency.
Any time the emotional buttons are being pushed, you have partisan rhetoric. There are rarely any facts, which would be the correct data, involved in these types of arguments. The gun control issue is one of these. In an effort to do something because children are being killed in schools, the partisan comments would blame law abiding people who do not participate in this. Mental health issues are not brought up by these politicians because it does not sound dramatic enough.
Going to a debate is somewhere that many people believe they will be able to find this type of factual substance. They would be wrong. The rules usually do not allow for the imparting of anything that might actually give any real information to the attendees. One side does not want messages of this nature to get out and the other side just wants to get along with the first side.
When looking for some of the websites that promise middle of the road coverage over all things political, analyze them carefully. Looking for the emotional content or the outright advertising that is usually present will indicate where they fall on each issue. There are some who are much better than others, but true fact based information is extremely hard to locate.
Non-partisan political information is facts. It generally will not bolster any particular side of a political issue. The recitation of facts may favor one side more than another, however, if there is emotional content within it, it is not factual and, therefore, quite partisan.
News junkies used to be able to switch between a few channels on the television or radio and get a good idea about things. There are more media outlets, given the Internet and additional channels because of cable and satellite, however, this has not helped in the matter. In order for truly non partisan information, there must be a desire to respect people enough to give them facts.
Presenting facts, by the talking heads, would not be in their best interests, or so they believe. Political subject matter, in order to be valuable in their minds, must be what the voters want to hear. This makes it extremely important that the information presented be weighted by good sounding comments. This has ushered in bumper sticker politics. None of this is helpful to news junkies as they do not get anywhere near enough informative reporting.
Take the issue of health care, for example. Factual content would simply report the statistics of the number of people who do not have insurance coverage or who have no access to health care. These listeners are told, instead, the emotional recounting of people who have had problems with health care. They fudge the numbers to make it seem as if millions are unable to access health care in an emergency.
Any time the emotional buttons are being pushed, you have partisan rhetoric. There are rarely any facts, which would be the correct data, involved in these types of arguments. The gun control issue is one of these. In an effort to do something because children are being killed in schools, the partisan comments would blame law abiding people who do not participate in this. Mental health issues are not brought up by these politicians because it does not sound dramatic enough.
Going to a debate is somewhere that many people believe they will be able to find this type of factual substance. They would be wrong. The rules usually do not allow for the imparting of anything that might actually give any real information to the attendees. One side does not want messages of this nature to get out and the other side just wants to get along with the first side.
When looking for some of the websites that promise middle of the road coverage over all things political, analyze them carefully. Looking for the emotional content or the outright advertising that is usually present will indicate where they fall on each issue. There are some who are much better than others, but true fact based information is extremely hard to locate.
Non-partisan political information is facts. It generally will not bolster any particular side of a political issue. The recitation of facts may favor one side more than another, however, if there is emotional content within it, it is not factual and, therefore, quite partisan.
About the Author:
Read more about Non-Partisan Political Information Is Not Presented Through The Media visiting our website.