Neither political party is immune to telling you what they want you to know. It does not matter whether it is the left or the right, they all want you to become invested with their opinions and thoughts. They want you to become infused with excitement for the actions they want to take. Non-partisan political information will help you see the difference between the two or, sometimes, three sides of the issue.
The propensity for the dominant media to listen only to one side of every issue makes the idea of a free press less attractive to many. The politicians that are listened to will have all of the say, in this way, for those who only get their news this way. There used to be hard news and commentary, both of them separate from each other, editorially. Now that distinction has been all but eliminated for the past 30 years.
Since non-partisan political information is the statement of facts and what, where, when, why and who is supposed to be the norm, the news is no longer that. Many people are excited about the inclusion of this definite one sided reporting. It does, however, help to color the thoughts of people who go nowhere else for their news.
Debates are in places and conducted in such ways as to prevent this type of information from getting the people. There is more heat than light in any debate and the reporting of same is treated as a way of promoting one side over the other. This is accomplished with countless discussions about who won or lost. Without factual information, the people lose.
Many people appreciate the highly partisan rhetoric that is confused as political debates. Many of them need the comfort that they have it right, regardless of whether or not it is. A lot of these individuals do not want to get it right, they just want their believes, fears and or opinions supported in some way and this makes them feel good.
The inability to get a clear idea about things are especially important as we discuss gun violence. One side will say that guns are dangerous and, by having more weapons on the street, the violence is expanding. This contributes to the idea that everyone who buys a gun is going to become a crime statistic. The fact, on the other side is that, as gun ownership is more wide spread, gun crimes have gone down.
The political maneuvering around the issue of immigration is also lacking in facts. One side will tell everyone that all immigrants must be allowed in and, therefore, the laws do not mean what they say they mean. The other side will point out that legal and illegal do mean different things. They stand for the rule of law, however, none of this gets past the emotional reports about this issue.
No politician wants to be accused of standing in the way of people understanding what those same politicians are doing to or for the American people. They will tell all, far and wide, what they want the people to know and it will not be what they are actually doing. All they have to present is what they are supposed to tell their audiences because non-partisan political information will not assist them in making themselves look good.
The propensity for the dominant media to listen only to one side of every issue makes the idea of a free press less attractive to many. The politicians that are listened to will have all of the say, in this way, for those who only get their news this way. There used to be hard news and commentary, both of them separate from each other, editorially. Now that distinction has been all but eliminated for the past 30 years.
Since non-partisan political information is the statement of facts and what, where, when, why and who is supposed to be the norm, the news is no longer that. Many people are excited about the inclusion of this definite one sided reporting. It does, however, help to color the thoughts of people who go nowhere else for their news.
Debates are in places and conducted in such ways as to prevent this type of information from getting the people. There is more heat than light in any debate and the reporting of same is treated as a way of promoting one side over the other. This is accomplished with countless discussions about who won or lost. Without factual information, the people lose.
Many people appreciate the highly partisan rhetoric that is confused as political debates. Many of them need the comfort that they have it right, regardless of whether or not it is. A lot of these individuals do not want to get it right, they just want their believes, fears and or opinions supported in some way and this makes them feel good.
The inability to get a clear idea about things are especially important as we discuss gun violence. One side will say that guns are dangerous and, by having more weapons on the street, the violence is expanding. This contributes to the idea that everyone who buys a gun is going to become a crime statistic. The fact, on the other side is that, as gun ownership is more wide spread, gun crimes have gone down.
The political maneuvering around the issue of immigration is also lacking in facts. One side will tell everyone that all immigrants must be allowed in and, therefore, the laws do not mean what they say they mean. The other side will point out that legal and illegal do mean different things. They stand for the rule of law, however, none of this gets past the emotional reports about this issue.
No politician wants to be accused of standing in the way of people understanding what those same politicians are doing to or for the American people. They will tell all, far and wide, what they want the people to know and it will not be what they are actually doing. All they have to present is what they are supposed to tell their audiences because non-partisan political information will not assist them in making themselves look good.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.politicalcriticalanalysis.com for more helpful information about Do Not Expect Non-Partisan Political Information From The Media