How society plays a part in the Singapore education system

By Jane Yang


The recent speech by the Minister of Education Mr Heng Swee Keat goes deeper versus the usual arguments about the positives and negatives of present education system. One particular key term that he stressed in his address is "fundamental". We have to go back to the requisites of education.

An education system does the very best when it really meets its fundamental missions. Every single society has general expectations as well as ideals embraced by most members of the community. To guarantee the continuity of those fundamental spirits, training of your youthful generation turns into an essential means. Therefore we will much better evaluate the Singapore education system in light of the fundamentals as a much more helpful approach of examination.

First, the society places a premium on equity. In addition to man inherent sense of equity, Singaporeans recognize the essential functionality of justness in running a racially-diverse community or optimizing the utilization of capable people in a compact population.

Consequently, it suffices to say the idea of justness has become nailed into the head of Singaporeans. This kind of an idea is also reflected in Singapore's education system. Despite the calling for abolishing examinations, especially the PSLE, such a probability continues to be far off. Even minister of education does not endorse the move, as witnessed in his description of how some countries that used to eliminate exams are going back to exam-based solutions.

Exams, as strenuous as they are, established impartial standard of comparison. A grade of Ninety is better when compared with a result of 89. Though it can be arguable simply how much difference does that one mark actually makes, the score-based evaluation primarily based on standardized tests has proved for being far more effective and equitable compared to every other option: the interview-based test, the talent-based assessment where fuzy appraisal is involved.

The grade allocated to a dancing performance by a student applicant is primarily haphazard, and fluctuates across various assessors, who may possibly by themself be affected by their particular idea of brilliance, their experiences and in many cases their mood on the day of evaluation.

Consequently, examination score results carry considerably additional weight of influence that appeals to men and women's sense of equity. Consequently, it may not be a good idea to contend for abolishing examinations when such a proposal infringes one of several fundamental values people hold dear to.

Additionally, the skills and values educated in classes reflect the public demand for such abilities among individuals. The academic institutions tend to be generally tuned in to social requirements because of competition in getting the top students.

The individuals with the ideal set of characteristics the society wants are much more probable to realize success once they graduate. Graduating an impressive batch of university students adds to the reputation of colleges which will entice students with improved branding.

Hence, the school will seek to equip students with all the socially desirable competencies and values.

The Anglo-Chinese School (Independent), with its one of a kind IB syllabus that concentrates on breath along with independent analysis, is drawing finest secondary school applicants. The Singapore Management University, due to its one of a kind seminar teaching approach as well as intensive presentation training, helps make its grads highly marketable. A number of critics feel concerned about the value training and skill impartation which can be compromised by a strong emphasis on exams.

Nevertheless due to competition between universities for diversity as well as branding, the potential of education and learning arena might not end up as hopeless as some may predict. Schools are aware that simply by producing high scorers will not make their graduates move far, and that will be reflected in testimonies such as graduate employment survey that moms and dads in addition to would-be students closely examine annually.

Therefore what the government should do may possibly not be dictating value schooling from a top-down strategy, but instead motivate the diversity and competition amongst schools whilst improving a series of graduate surveys and research to further improve the data flow, which in the end incentivizes colleges to respond to what society actually wants.




About the Author: