When we talk to many people and when we spend time in the media and television we can see that many times, the meaning for the word science has become synonymous with evolution. I wonder who gave this interpretation to the word science as when we look at the dictionary, we found that the meaning of the word science equals knowledge .
I consider who gave this understanding to the expression science as when we check out the dictionaries, we find that the significance of the word science equals knoweldge . Science is anything which has in common with learning. Besides not only theory, but a theory needs to be able to be proven. Something we can 1 Demonstrate 2 Test 3 Prove . What is creation? Truly the creation story can't be perceived with eyes, however the same can be said with the big bang.
Is there a movie showing the big bang in action? Additionally a picture? No. Essentially for the explanation for why that the universe is expanding which the exact same thing written in the Bible saying that the universe would expand after the creation. Then progression scientists set that this growth has as a rule happened since billions of years. In any case this is not science, as it is remarkably unrealistic to show that the universe is more than 6000 years old !
In the battle between evolution vs creation and creationism we see that the oldest reef in the world is only 4000 years old, dating back from the flood. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years? This comes from the Australian government who measured at which rate the great barrier reef grows, and found out this reef is only 4000 years old. Sounds like creationism is right!
Resolving the debate truth about evolution vs creation, measuring the rate of deposit stored in deltas, we come across that the eldest deltas in the planet are just 4000 years old. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years in the past?
Evolution vs creation we additionally discover that the most oldest tree is just 4000 years old. Why is that if the earth has been around billions of years? Looks like creationism is correct. In this fantastic verbal confrontation between evolution vs creation we see that many facts are missing. Science was not concocted by Darwin. As a matter of fact most branches of science have been begun by creationists. Might you consider Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Mendel to be religious men or scientists? I urge you to test further examine this essential issue evolution vs creation.
I consider who gave this understanding to the expression science as when we check out the dictionaries, we find that the significance of the word science equals knoweldge . Science is anything which has in common with learning. Besides not only theory, but a theory needs to be able to be proven. Something we can 1 Demonstrate 2 Test 3 Prove . What is creation? Truly the creation story can't be perceived with eyes, however the same can be said with the big bang.
Is there a movie showing the big bang in action? Additionally a picture? No. Essentially for the explanation for why that the universe is expanding which the exact same thing written in the Bible saying that the universe would expand after the creation. Then progression scientists set that this growth has as a rule happened since billions of years. In any case this is not science, as it is remarkably unrealistic to show that the universe is more than 6000 years old !
In the battle between evolution vs creation and creationism we see that the oldest reef in the world is only 4000 years old, dating back from the flood. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years? This comes from the Australian government who measured at which rate the great barrier reef grows, and found out this reef is only 4000 years old. Sounds like creationism is right!
Resolving the debate truth about evolution vs creation, measuring the rate of deposit stored in deltas, we come across that the eldest deltas in the planet are just 4000 years old. Why is that is the earth has been around billions of years in the past?
Evolution vs creation we additionally discover that the most oldest tree is just 4000 years old. Why is that if the earth has been around billions of years? Looks like creationism is correct. In this fantastic verbal confrontation between evolution vs creation we see that many facts are missing. Science was not concocted by Darwin. As a matter of fact most branches of science have been begun by creationists. Might you consider Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Mendel to be religious men or scientists? I urge you to test further examine this essential issue evolution vs creation.
About the Author:
What is the meaning of the word science? Science means only knowledge. In this evolution vs creation debate the question is: Is Evolution science? No. Is creationism science? Yes